We are entering a new and uncharted world. A spiritual world some might argue; a world in which answers are desperately needed. And for the first time since the Enlightenment, a world in which science cannot provide all the answers.
Are we equipped for this new journey of exploration?
I think there is a certain wisdom to be learned from the Atheist. They clearly see the problems with the fundamental-mindset and lack of open mindedness and prohibition of doubt and skepticism present within some of the world's great religions. (They also, often in error, assume these are necessary prerequisites for the religions).
Hinduism, Buddhism, the Chinese-syncretism (Taoism, Confucianism,Buddhism), Judaism, Christianity, and Islam; the great religions of
the Axial Age.
“No great new
religion has swept into world prominence since Islam some 1300 years
ago. Does this mean that the foregoing list completes the roll call
of living religions? Yes, and no.”
If we accept
Emergence Theory, the existence of cultures and religions are a fluid
and evolving thing. It may occur in leaps and bounds and the Axial
Age may very well have been a leap or bound, but it cannot be the
final word. It cannot be the final step. What will be the next step
in their – or indeed, our
– evolution?
“Through the
centuries men have died for the right to believe, but other men
equally sincere have died for the right to disbelieve. However we may
rate their wisdom, we must credit them with a kind of religious
fervor in defense of their faith. For atheism too is a faith, in the
sense that it is based on belief rather than scientific proof.
“In its
narrowest sense the term atheist means one who denies the existence
of any and all gods. But it has come to apply to those, including skeptics materialists and positivists, who do not acknowledge that
the world was created by a being or beings of incomprehensibly
magnified human intelligence and form, and also an uncounted number
of people the world over who would consider that they fit the word's
broader implications.
“Since pure
atheism and agnosticism obviously do nothing towards answering the
ultimate riddle of life, some nonbelievers have turned to humanism –
a term which has had many varying meanings, but which today,
according to Corliss Lamont in Humanism
as a Philosophy, “is the viewpoint that men have but one
life to lead and should make the most of it in terms of creative work
and happiness; that human happiness is its own justification and
requires no sanction or support from supernatural sources; that in
any case the supernatural, usually conceived of in the form of
heavenly gods or immortal heavens, does not exist; and that human
beings, using their own intelligence and cooperating liberally with
one another, can build an enduring citadel of peace and beauty upon
this earth.
“And finally
there has emerged in contemporary history another great power over
men's minds and acts – indeed, a faith – which is at once the
denial of all religion and the most potent expression of secular
religion ever to challenge the other faiths... Communism.” The
World Great Religions, Time Incorporated, New York, 1957, pg. 8
Does our modern age contain within itself a New Axial Age?
I don't see issues with Atheism as an alternative Belief-System, but
we have seen the rise of Atheist-fundamentalism, and I do see issues
with this 'flavour'. It is the last thing we need.
We also have seen the birth of Humanism (and it's darker brother,
Communism).
I
think another hallmark of our potential modern Axial Age is a sort of
pluralism, or syncretism of faiths. And this gives me hope. I think
it's important that we acknowledge and identify their existences.
Yes, we have historically seen syncretism in the past, with the
Romans and much of Hindu's numerous millennial spanning life is a
testament to syncretism. But what is unique today
is that we exist in a global society – we live in a much smaller
world.
The
option of a fundamentalist position now,can only lead to Empire or
destruction. And isolationism is no longer an option.
In
the New Axial Age, can Pluralism, the New
Religions of Atheism,
Scientism, Communism, and Humanism (in their various forms) find their place in
an ever shrinking global community?
Will they sow the seeds of conflict and destruction? Will they become akin to the religions they so hate by competing for power, human resources, and authority?
Or could these be the tools we need to navigate into this new world?
Personally, I'd like to believe in the latter.
Will they sow the seeds of conflict and destruction? Will they become akin to the religions they so hate by competing for power, human resources, and authority?
Or could these be the tools we need to navigate into this new world?
Personally, I'd like to believe in the latter.
No comments:
Post a Comment