- To be against racism is to be synonymous with being FOR equality.
- To believe in equality - by its very definition - means being against inequality. (This sounds redundant, but needs to be stated to reveal the flaw in a particular position's logic. What would the opposing position be? Anti-racist but pro-inequality?)
- To believe in equality means the equality of all people....
- Read it again: all people.
- One more time: ALL people.
It
is not a subversive or subservient agenda focused on some misplaced
sense of justice, retribution or vengeance. To use the analogy of a
totem pole, it should not be about turning the totem pole upside
down, but laying it on its side (to stay with the idiom, there ceases
to be a "high man on the totem pole," not a reversal of
that "high man.")
Its
opposite (and only truly tenable position) - Anti-racist/Pro-equality
- does not allow any sense of justified-discrimination. It does not
embrace a zero-sum equation belief; that one's loss means another's
gain, as a necessity.
This
is not to say an individual should not be accountable and responsible
for their actions or crimes. It is to say an individual cannot be
responsible or accountable for their ancestors actions or crimes. To
believe the latter is in itself a form of racism.
There
is a dangerous, passive political momentum right now that not only
allows, but encourages this perilous position and those subterfuge
individuals that engage, promote and manipulate through it.
"Racism
is the belief* in the superiority of one race over another. It may
also mean prejudice**, discrimination**, or antagonism** directed
against other people because they are of a different race or
ethnicity."
*
Belief. This is an intentional act and position, not an accidental
one. Ergo, you cannot be an accidental racist. Racism is a deliberate
act or position. It may be based upon erroneous not inaccurate
information, but nevertheless is a conscious decision.
**
Prejudice, discrimination, and antagonism are all beliefs manifesting
in action.
Racism
necessitates two things: Intent and malicious action. Contrary to
Justin Trudeau's definition, one cannot be an accidental racist.
Intent DOES matter. (And this is not to say unintentional actions
cannot harm).
(For
further and better understanding of one's intent, see TedTalks withSally Kohn's Emotional Correctness: https://youtu.be/NCJTV5KaJJc
Actions
and words may be inappropriate, rude, insensitive, belligerent,
unlawful and hurtful without being racist. To believe otherwise is to
group Nazis, KKK, those guilty of genocide and White Supremists into
the exact same category as one who spouts off an inappropriate
comment. (These are not excusable, but neither are they the same
things.) This position is actually lessening the perpetrators of
these horrific crimes and/or worldview. Watering them down, if you
will.
I
am an advocate for semantics. Once we can successfully label
something, we can identify it, better explore it, and ultimately,
understand it, or, as the case might be, bring it into the bright
light of day. It currently finds its existence in the security of
shadows.
These
two forms of "Racism" need to be properly named and
identified. For one is a wolf in sheep's clothing, and incredibly
dangerous to our true growth of multiculturalism and equality.